It’s nothing to do with you.

I wonder what is going on in the tiny minds of MP’s sometimes. Actually, I wonder what is going on in there most of the time.

The country is a bloody mess, mainly down to their incessant meddling. Babies get sent home from hospital with dummies taped to their face, whilst others who go in fairly healthy for some minor surgery get an infection and snuff it. Not content with that, some practitioners take it upon themselves to decide who lives and who dies in their care. Sure the managers are to blame, but who is giving the orders? Politicians.

Our armed forces get their numbers cut, yet find themselves active in more and more theatres across the world. Now it looks as if we’ll be sending troops into Mali. The reasoning behind this seems to be that we haven’t really pissed people off in Africa for a long time and it is time we went and got involved in yet another conflict that doesn’t concern us. It seems to me it is the MP’s who go running off to some fly-blown hell hole at the drop of a hat. I’m fairly sure the brass would be happy staying put in Aldershot and Catterick.

Our children leave school functionally illiterate and innumerate, and the political class rail against the ‘inequalities’ between the private and public sector schools, despite most of them being products of the former with no intention of letting their kids get involved in the latter. I read a story recently where a school changed the names of their form classes to the planets of the solar system from figures such as Wellington and Nelson. The reasoning behind this was that the kids didn’t know who Wellington was. Well they bloody should. Perhaps if less time were spent agonising over the Indian partition and the religious sensibilities therein and more time spent teaching about Boudicca, Alfred the Great and Montgomery, then the kids might be a little more on the ball. Politicians cannot help but declare they know what kids should be learning, how they should be doing it, and that results are better than ever.

This morning the calls have come again for a fizzy drink tax, for the good of the children. Note that the kids won’t pay this tax, their parents will, or they’ll just be lifted from the shelves in a clandestine manner. The drink will still get drunk. What these people campaigning for this tax want is the money. There was some simpering arsewipe on Sky News this morning talking about something along the lines of a ‘Childrens’ future fund’.

Yeah, right. Of course a handling fee will need to be added, those kiddies’ futures aren’t going to manage themselves, are they? At every turn we are beset with people who demand cash in the most cynical terms so they can do ‘something’ without actually accomplishing anything. Why would they want to accomplish anything? If the problem goes away, so does their funding. The money isn’t a means to an end, it is the end itself. And these bastards continually employ emotional blackmail against us so they can do it with our money. I hate them, it is a boiling, sulphurous pot of rage – it makes me very, very angry indeed. The politicians listen and nod sagely at the demands of these people who are paid with our money as they shriek for more of the same. It is seen as something being done.

And then, if this meddling, nannying, thoughtless carrying on wasn’t enough, I wake up this morning to discover that the group of people who have been found submitting fraudulent expenses claims, submitting claims that looked fraudulent but were actually within the rules they made themselves, who will represent their constituents only if it does not go against what is in the best interests of their party, financial backers or their own naked self interest, and are responsible for the financial mess we find ourselves in, have decided that the FA isn’t doing things properly.

This is arrogance of the most shocking order.

I’m almost at a loss for words.

The culture, media and sport select committee believes the Premier League wields too much influence over the game in England and had ordered reforms.

Its concerns cover financial management, the balance of power between the Premier League and the FA and major financial risk-taking.

An MP actually put this out. How did they keep a straight face?

Now, as rotten and corrupt as the governance of the world game is, it takes chutzpah of staggering proportions for a group of MP’s to start throwing stones about this.

It is nothing to do with you. Nothing at all. The game is not publicly funded. Whilst it is popular, it is not part of public life, it is not a necessity that needs regulating. The league system is comprised of 92 private businesses working together, some will be well run, some will be poorly run, some will be run by crooks. None of it is of any concern to parliament at all.

So stupid, so self absorbed are these people, so convinced are they by their own sense of magnificence, that they think they can legislate to nobble an organisation they think is too powerful.

Well, firstly, if there’s an organisation you want to nobble because it is too powerful, try going after the one in Brussels, not Sloane Square.

Secondly, given your track record over the last couple of hundred years, it seems likely to me that any item of legislation you shit out will only make things worse, because it will be reactionary, ill thought out, loaded with an agenda, full of loopholes and will likely have the opposite effect to that intended. You see the big football clubs are rich, they can afford lawyers who will run rings around the treasury solicitors.

Finally, as they have proven in the past, FIFA will go to war with any government that forces itself onto the game. In case you hadn’t noticed, FIFA president Sepp Blatter doesn’t like us very much. He doesn’t like the fact that the Home Nations have so many seats on the big committees. He doesn’t like the fact that our media regularly exposes his malfeasance. He doesn’t like the fact that we created a song and dance over not getting the World Cup. He doesn’t like the Premier League’s success. FIFA can and will suspend the FA if the government gets involved. That means no England games, no World Cup, that means UEFA would also have to exclude England and English clubs from continental competition as well.

So, why not worry about your bloody mess, rather than somebody else’s?

Arseclowns. What are these morons for?

(Post script: Internet problems persist. The old pixie who didn’t work at all has been replaced with a new pixie who seems to be a radical militant trade unionist. So now the internet works fine during the day, but will not in the evenings and at weekends. An engineer is due today with a magic internet pixie defibrillator.)

Ghosts and ghouls and statists that go bump in the night.

A hairy skellington, preparing to go out and frighten people tonight.

The dichotomy of modern government is that the existence of ministerial pay-packets, pensions, perks and kudos relies on those incumbent in the offices doing things, whereas the most effective way for things to happen is for them to get out of the way and stop acting as a brake on every endeavour. They will never do this, or at least anyone who is a member of any of the big three parties won’t.

As is apt on Hallowe’en, a spirit from the past has risen up to try and give us all a scare.

Michael Heseltine has just popped back from the dead to give us the benefit of his wisdom by delivering an eighty something point plan for the government to ‘generate growth’. There are some crackers in there.

Local Enterprise Partnerships would be strengthened and given billions of pounds.

Right. And how is that going to generate growth? You take billions of pounds from one area of government and move it to another. Oh, there’ll be growth alright, the Local Enterprise Partnerships (and note ‘partnership’ as far as government and civil service are concerned is the private sector jumping through hoops for a few quid, becoming entirely beholden and subservient to the department handing out the cash) will grow, their staff numbers will increase, the little empires within will see their borders expanding and the budgets will run unchecked. Very little of that money will go to local enterprise. It would make more sense to not take the money off those same local enterprises in the first place. Growth in local, small, independent business? As close to nil as makes no difference.

Lord Heseltine also calls for councils to be given a legal duty to promote development

What does that even mean? Look, dickhead, it is the job of the council to make sure the bins are emptied, that the pavements are in a decent state of repair, that the grass in the park is cut. How the hell are they supposed to promote development? It means nothing. Nothing at all. Are we talking about publicising what a wonderful place Crapshire is for doing business? It’s easy for you, if you think that Crapchester would benefit from having the Dept. for toenail clippings and belly button fluff based in the town then you move it there, because truth be told it doesn’t matter where the department is based. For enterprise to succeed there has to be a demand for the service or product provided, this is why you can walk around the streets of Kettering all day long and not find a ship’s chandler – there’s no demand. Government and quangos cannot create that demand, it just can’t.

and for pay restrictions on the senior Civil Service to be lifted to attract private sector talent. He says it “takes too long for decisions to be made” by civil servants and ministers.

Oh for crying out loud. Look, try to get this through your thick skull; government cannot drive growth, it can only get out of the way and let it happen. We don’t need private sector talent immobilised in the tedium and administration of the civil service, we need them in the private sector generating wealth, it doesn’t matter if they are the greatest entrepreneur the world has ever seen, all the time they are in the public sector they will not generate any money, the public sector consumes it does not generate, accept this fact. The reason that entrepreneurs can make decisions is that they are in sole charge of their enterprise, they live and die by their decisions, thus those who are best at making decisions remain in business longer and make a lot of money.

In the civil service you can’t even get a light bulb changed without a committee meeting and agonising over the budget for the bulb, the budget for the wages of the person changing the bulb, the environmental aspect of the new bulb and the disposal of the old. It takes an age to do anything, because all these little empires have their little emperors, obsessed with protocol and grades and responsibility and liability, and making a decision takes forever, then once the decision is taken the paperwork has to be done so the fact that protocol and grades and responsibility and liability have been considered can be documented in case of the feared and mythical audit. The entrepreneur will give the office boy a fiver from the petty cash and send him down to Homebase to buy a lightbulb.

Ministers are even worse, they will not worry about whether what they have proposed is correct and desirable, they will worry about how it makes them look on Newsnight or in the Grauniad, how it matches with the PM’s statement on bananas or his launch of the new washing line policy, and more importantly will it get them re-elected or allow them to move further up the greasy pole? This is compounded by the fact that they are crippled with indecision because they know nothing about the subject their department is there to regulate and thus they must be guided by a group of civil servants who are obsessed with protocol, grade, responsibility and liability and can’t answer the simplest question without going away and setting up a project group and a steering committee, because they are scared witless that the ‘wrong’ answer, that being one where the response has an undesirable effect rather than it being incorrect in fact, will lead to their little empire being trimmed or swept away.

He believes that all money earmarked for economic growth should be collected together, with local partnerships able to bid for funding. About £9 billion of European funding for deprived areas should also be handed straight to localities to spend on kick-starting the economy.

Note that in that there’s no mention of money going to businesses, it’s all about vague political platitudes of kick starting. Like I said above, you can’t generate demand by spending money. You can build the world’s biggest cupcake shop, but if people nearby don’t want cupcakes, it ain’t going to make any difference, is it?

Furthermore, it isn’t £9 billion of European funding, it’s £9 billion of our funding, that was probably closer to £14 billion when it left these shores for Brussels. Money, and I really can’t state this often or clearly enough, that would be sloshing around our economy already had it not been taken off the taxpayer and corporations in the first place. Good God man, the £9 billion funding is a symptom of the malaise, not the cure.

The effort should be overseen by a National Growth Council headed by the Prime Minister. Cabinet ministers would oversee different areas and senior civil servants would be hired by those with business expertise.

A. National. Growth. Council. Kill me now, just kill me now. So vain, so arrogant and so hubristic are these people, they think that if they form yet another talking shop they can somehow make people go and spend money they don’t have on a service they don’t need. You’re just replicating what happened before the crash, you stupid, stupid, stupid man. People with business expertise will not be interested in hiring civil servants, they’re too busy trying to generate money, despite the best efforts of the government to frustrate them at every turn, by running their business.

Dumber than a bag of hair.

Government can no more generate jobs and wealth than I can spin straw into gold.

Here’s a simple 6 step plan to get the hell out of the way and allow growth to happen:

1. Slash corporation tax.

2. Slash income tax.

3. Slash VAT.

4. Abolish employer’s NI contributions.

5. Stop taking all our bloody money, stop spending it, stop borrowing money that doesn’t belong to us, stop spending that money as well.

6. Sit quietly behind your desk and don’t touch anything.

Simple.

 

So, how are you doing?

Back in February 2010 I wrote an article detailing the parameters I would judge the new government by. This was in response to a series of 8 benchmarks published by Osborne telling us how we should judge the record of any Conservative government. At the time I commented that it was for us to judge the government by our own criteria, not those set out by the people in the job, because somehow I get the feeling if we let them set the criteria, they’ll also complete the assessment.

Here are my eight benchmarks as stated at the time, and my assessment of each today. I have made no allowances for the fact that it turned out to be a hung parliament, if the Tories couldn’t beat one of the worst governments in the history of this country then that’s their bloody fault.

1- I’ll make the first one easy, shall I? Call in the civil service heads of department and find out what they actually know about the areas they are responsible for. If they ‘errrrm’, ‘arrrrrr’, ‘get back to you on that’ or ‘don’t know’ then get rid of them. Then get rid of the layer below them, and probably the next 2 layers below that. I know for a fact that higher/middle senior civil service management keep their very high management in the dark, lest they find out the awful truth. The senior managers haven’t figured this out yet. Get shot of the lot of them.

Well, there was the whole Brodie Clark affair, wasn’t there? The bureaucracy rumbles on unfettered, unchanged, unthinking. Fail.

2- Destroy the quango’s. Lay waste to them. There’s a huge saving right there, you needn’t touch the police, schools or hospitals and still save shitloads.

A few superficial cuts in the early days, but still we’re saddled with ridiculous entities hoovering vast lakes of cash at a time when borrowing has never been higher. Fail.

3- But do touch the police, schools or hospitals. Waste is endemic. Make them account for every single penny if they value their continued employment. Make them feel that every penny is coming out of their own personal pocket. Forbid them from cutting front line services. In fact, make them expand front line services. If they fail, no pay-off, no pension, just the sack. Make the police arrest proper bad people, no more community this, and outreach that. The police are for catching criminals. Make schools teach pupils, no more social work or community engineering, forget these endless tests, most teachers aren’t idiots and know which pupils are outstanding, which pupils aren’t so hot and which pupils need a kick up the arse to perform. Let headteachers discipline badly behaved kids, the rights of the kids that want to learn trump those of kids who don’t. Let doctors make people better, no smoking or drinking questioning, if they’re ill, then cure it. Give Matron control over blocks of four to six wards, make her responsible for the cleaning and bed/theatre management. Matron rocks and knows much better than the Health Secretary, she certainly knows better than the doctors. Give her the staff and authority.

Police and teachers continue to be social workers and indoctrination agents. The old bill stood by helplessly while London burned. We still see reports of coppers and plastic plods stopping people from taking photos on the street, picking low hanging fruit, being obsessed  with and paralysed by the socio-political considerations of cases, trends and profiles rather than asking the simple question ‘is he a villain?’ We also see that at the top they are criminals and far too cosy with the press. However I will give credit for the implementation of elected police chiefs. Kids are still tested to the limit and the position of the schools on the league table is more important than the education the kids are getting – they are coached to pass exams, not given an education. Heads have marginally more control over their schools, but this seems to me to be superficial at best. I will say in the Tories’ defence that the free schools programme is excellent, so credit there. Hospitals and the NHS are still mired in administration, infections continue to kill people who went in to be made better. The new plan that has been in the news much of late is still being seen in terms of government vs. practitioners, still no mention of the patients as I entreated the other day, and doesn’t alter the ethos of a service which doesn’t actually seem that good at serving the people that have paid for it. – Fail with credit.

4- Once you’ve cut the spending, cut the taxes. Bring back the lower band for lower earners. Give people coming off benefits one year tax free to establish themselves. Get them out of that trap. Reward them for getting off their arses, don’t reward them for wandering into the labyrinth.

No, not even close. Taxes continue with the 50p tax band and so forth. This government taxes more and spends more than the one that went before. Epic fail.

5- Reduce the duty on petrol. It’s a fucking joke. You’re crippling workers and businesses. Outside the cities, public transport is not up to the job of people moving around. It can get better, but in the short term people need help. This amounts to a tax on going to work. It sucks.

Oh dear. This is raising its ugly head again. This is an incredibly pernicious form of taxation, penalising manufacturing, retail and Joe Public going to work, etc. Don’t expect credit for not putting it up. It needs cutting, slashing, and it needs doing now. I don’t think even a freeze on the duty in the forthcoming budget will lend credibility to Tory claims of being business friendly. How are we supposed to recover when the government penalises us for moving us and our stuff around? Epic fail.

6- Give us the referendum on the Lisbon treaty like you promised. At least. Better still, give us the big one. If the majority of people want to come out of Europe, then accept it. You will be there to represent our wishes, not to impose yours on us. Remember that.

Not only did you fail to give us the referendum you promised, when we forced your hand you wheeled out the whips and made rebels of the MPs who actually represent your own members’ views. Nice one. You talk to us as if we’re children and tell us our opinion is worthless. I won’t forget that, I suspect many Tory voters and members won’t either. Catastrophic fail of gargantuan and epic proportions.

7- If our military really have to play silly buggers over the world. Then give them the kit to do the job. Give them proper healthcare and proper housing. Exempt them from tax. Give them the support to shoot back at people who shoot at them until they are all dead. Give them the power to sink pirates’ boats, if the pirates are on those boats at the time, all the better. If they are aboard our boats, then maroon them. Act like a pirate, die like a pirate. Engage in piracy or attack our troops, then it’s all good.

Armed forces cut in number, the whole fighter/aircraft carrier fiasco. At least we’re out of Iraq and the ‘stan is set to follow. However I look nervously towards Iran. Fail with a sliver of credit.

8- Get your noses out of our lives. Stop measuring, watching, tracking, investigating, following, recording, monitoring and nannying us. It pisses us off and we’ve done nothing wrong.

Again, after a promising start with the removal of ID cards and HIPs in the first couple of days, it swiftly dissolved into nothing as all the measures implemented by Labour remain in place and in use. Not good enough. Fail.

So, two years on, I am unable to report any significant improvement in any category, in the main there has been no progress at all, and in a couple of cases things have gone backwards.

You’ve a long way to go boys and girls, but from where I’m sitting, you’ll be able to count yourself damn lucky to get a second bite of the cherry, and should fall to your knees and thank God for the existence of Miliband and Clegg, because they are the only people that will keep you in your current position, it certainly won’t be because you’re any good.

You have to admire them.

 But officer, it said to turn around immediately. . .

 

At the risk of stating the bleeding obvious, things are a little dicey at the moment. The country is deeply embroiled in a wider European financial morass, the architects of which we still don’t have the courage to tell to sod off. There have been riots on the streets that had no focus other than to loot and destroy as the social engineering project of the last 25 years has spectacularly blown up. In the Middle East our troops continue to be killed in countries where we have imposed ‘democracy’ as the populations in other states rise up and take it back whether we like it or not, even if the people who were heading those countries up are like, our mates, and the sabres are being rattled with great gusto over the movement of oil through the Straits of Hormuz.

However, all of this pales into insignificance in the face of. . .

 

 

 

 

. . . wait for it. . .

 

 

 

 

. . . people who don’t update the maps on their sat-nav systems!

Yes, so comprehensive a handle and solution does the government have to all our many and varied problems that they’ve found time to hold a summit on a navigation system:

The problems caused when lorry and car drivers are misdirected by out-of-date directions from their sat-navs are to be tackled at a government summit.

Good God, in their tiny little minds they really think there’s nothing they can’t sort out. Never mind the fact the track record of any area of life that any government has gotten involved in is one of total and abject failure. This is important dammit.

In October, Bruton high street in Somerset was shut for 24 hours after a lorry became wedged in a narrow street.

And yes, dear reader, only the government can help. Heaven forbid that the lorry driver should look out of his windscreen and see the sign warning about how narrow the street is. Oh no, it’s not his fault, it’s the fault of the satnav. Here comes SuperGov!

“It is vital highway authorities, mapping companies and sat-nav manufacturers work more closely together to provide drivers with accurate, up-to-date information on traffic restrictions such as narrow roads or low bridges.

It’s good business practice to do this, nobody wants an out of date TomTom, but if you don’t connect it to your pooter once in a while. . .

“This will help prevent huge lorries from being sent down inappropriate roads and ensure motorists are given the best possible directions.”

A cheaper way is for the driver, and if he’s driving an HGV the chances are he’s a professional driver, to look at the signs on the road. How to ensure they do this? Well, you could, you know, charge them with driving without due care and attention if they go down a narrow road when signs suggest that they won’t fit. I’ve been led astray by my sat-nav before now, and I’ve always avoided disaster by thinking to myself ‘hmmmm, this doesn’t look right’, retracing my route back to a main road and allowing the system to plot a new course, on occasion I’ve even consulted a map or, more shockingly, asked for directions. An HGV driver en route to an industrial estate would perhaps not expect to be driving down a 5′ wide street, would they? Take enough licences away and the message will get out quick enough.

But no, we have to have a ‘summit’ with ministers and civil servants, probably demanding that the sat-nav companies shell out some fairly hefty chunk of cash.

Aren’t politicians wonderful?

We’re saved!

When I went to bed last night, I lived in a country that was rudderless, tearing itself apart at the seams. Today I wake up in a brave new world to find that a new Jerusalem has indeed been builded here. We’re saved and can now sleep at night because:

David Cameron is to announce a review of every government policy following last week’s riots, to ensure they are bold enough to fix a “broken society”.

David, David, David, don’t you realise that this whole situation has come about precisely because of the continual interfering and tinkering by you and the rest of the political class? Each government in living memory has fiddled and nudged, incentivised and meddled with our society. You’ve been like painters who simply can’t stop adding to, subtracting from and re-touching their work. Where once there was a scene of rural bliss or urban majesty there is now just a big brown mess, you simply can’t leave things alone can you?

It puts in mind of the line from Sir Humphrey; ‘Something must be done, this is something, therefore it must be done.’

Society is so broken that if it were a car, you’d send it to the scrap yard and go and buy a new one, but of course we can’t do that with our society. If you’re expecting me to come up with some solution, then I think you’re going to be disappointed, I don’t have it. But more importantly, neither do the politicians. Even if they did have a solution, I doubt they’d actually put it into place, you see a politician isn’t looking at the newborns of today and wondering ‘how will my policies shape them as 18 year olds?’ Their only consideration is ‘I wonder how my policies will effect my chances at the next election?’ Politicians only ever look 5 years into the future; the wealth of the country, the wellbeing of the population, the education of the children, the health of the workforce, the retirement of the old – all of them are a very poor second to their keeping hold of power. It doesn’t matter a pair of dingo’s kidneys what happens twenty years in the future, the politician behind it will have been ousted or will be retired in grand opulence by the time those particular chickens come home to roost.

I’ve heard a lot of talk from social workers in the media this last week about the parents of the sort of people who were responsible for the looting. I’ve heard talk of houses with no food, no furniture beyond squalid, stained mattresses on the floors, dysfunctional relationships between adults and children, the spectre of drugs hanging over the household as everything has been sold to fund the habit.

When Cameron talks of a “slow-motion moral collapse” later, what he fails to realise is that is the actions of him and others like and preceding him who have brought this about. He and his ilk are just as neglectful and abusive as those drug addled parents. It isn’t a collapse, that suggests some sort of strain – the result of wear and tear on a much loved old system – it is the result of a wilful vandalism, a wholesale destruction of our society that has come from the top down as vain politicians chase the fashion of the day as espoused from some think tank or asinine nu-academic institution somewhere. We’ve seen a revolution, without a shot being fired. And like all revolutions, the people in charge look at the continuing chaos under their watch and come to the conclusion, the same conclusion every time; it can’t be the system – it’s our system, so it must be the people.

I don’t need to tell you the outcome of that line of thought.

We can have enquiries which take years to complete, by then the riots will be a distant memory, we’ll have rocked to the next crisis by then, probably the one after that, or even the one after that one. But it will make them feel better, the out of touch politicians can bandy the inquest word about, the out of touch judiciary can pass sentence once the social engineering storm troopers have stood before the panel and given their sage advice on how this society should work, how it does work on paper and how it will work because it’s their plan, dammit.

We can have senior police officers blaming the politicians, we can have politicians blaming the senior police officers. They are equally as culpable – the politicians for their legacy, the police for their operating instructions. They are both bedecked in the Emperor’s new clothes. None of them will have the guts to admit it.

We can have the party leaders taking pot shots at each other on the TV and over the despatch box, each hoping beyond hope that if they can dump enough blame on the other then they’ll have a chance of pushing the buttons for five minutes. Each hoping that we don’t come to the only conclusion that there is to draw; their policies and the legacies of the rotten parties they represent are behind this.

None of it will change anything. Oh, I could come up with a list of things to do as long your arm to prevent the newborn of the day from replicating the actions of the youths and young adults now, but what to do about the current set?

As I said, if it were a car, you’d scrap it. If it were a limb, you’d amputate it. If it were a pet, you’d put it to sleep. But we can’t do that, on a legal, moral or ethical basis.

What the hell do we do?

I really don’t have the answer. We can punish, but that doesn’t solve the problem. People will talk about education – it’s too late, they’ve just come through an education system which has failed them miserably and yet turns out better and better tractor production exam figures every year. We can give them money, but that is part of what has fuelled the problem. We can take their money and kick them out of their houses, and then what? Is that supposed to cut crime? Believe me, a comprehensive review of government policy that takes 18 months to complete is not the answer. That is the politicians’ way of saying ‘search me’.

Perhaps there are two things which can be done, and it is a bit out of left field. What I see is a group of people with no aspiration. They have no need of it, there is nothing to aspire to. I also see a group of people without jobs or worthwhile jobs. I refer again to a miserable failure of an education system, plus these people’s attitude. They will have to want to change, perhaps that is the clincher, you can’t make an addict give up, they have to want to. How to make them want to change? No point in nagging and nannying them, they have to see their friends and siblings getting on, with real prospects. But how? Government can’t create jobs, not real jobs, not jobs that provide their own worth the employer and employee. Sure enough they can provide posts, but the costs, well, look at the bank balance.

No, the best thing the government can do is to let people create their own jobs. So, let’s engage in some good old business practice, under-cut the opposition. Cut corporation tax, slash it. Make it the lowest in Europe. Make it so low that companies across the world beat a path to our door to set up camp, make it so low that it isn’t worth avoiding the payment of it – we’ll collect just as much tax anyway. Make it so cheap that these companies can’t employ enough people to get their business done, and will want to plug up the holes that our education system has left. Make it so cheap that the companies will want to fund CTC‘s to ensure that school leavers have skills that are actually needed in the workplace, rather than being able to recite the warble gloamists’ latest propaganda sheet.

It would also benefit society as a whole.

This is our society to fix, no-one else’s. If we do this, we have to pull out of the EU. We can’t fix our society if others flood in to reap the rewards of our policy. We can’t fix our society if business finds that it is strangled at the root by spiteful and hateful EUro regulations. Just as with the ‘sovereign debt’ that the ECB is buying up by the billion, billions of our money, they don’t care about our society, either. They have even less regard for society than our domestic politicians.

Let us take control, let us give these people something to aspire to. It cannot come from government, their leaden hand squashes spirit, enterprise and aspiration. THAT is what these people have been saying, in their own way.

Really Dave, you can’t help them. You don’t have the skills, you don’t have the tools, but only a politician’s arrogance would assume that if he can’t help them, then no-one can.

Extremism to be hit by spending cuts.

Or something.

The government is to publish an updated strategy for tackling extremism and terrorism, on Tuesday afternoon.

Good-oh, does it involve us keep our noses out of other people’s business? I’m guessing not because God knows their nose spends enough time in my business.

So how do we tackle extremism?

recommendations expected include monitoring people convicted of terrorism offences on their release

Oh, do you think? We’ve got all this wonderful legislation to stop all of us in the streets and spy on us, just in case we wake up one morning and discover we’ve developed an interest in peroxide, rusty nails and trains, and yet, you haven’t even had the nouse to keep an eye on the people who demonstrably do have such an interest? Isn’t this all a bit arse about face? Is it not common sense to keep tabs on those who are active rather than wasting time suspecting all of us?

a renewed focus on the use of the internet, as the government considers a “national blocking list” of violent and unlawful websites.

Hmmm, that rings a warning bell, there’s huge scope for mission drift there, it all sounds so reasonable, doesn’t it? I’m betting all the sites declared unlawful will be nodded through with the minimum of oversight. EDF? BNP? Any others?

A final draft of the new document, to be published in Parliament on Tuesday, was reportedly seen by the Times.

It says it was “possible” Prevent funding had gone to extremist groups promoting hardline beliefs.

Hang on a moment, you mean to say that some of the money earmarked to combat extremism has been handed to the extremists? Oh, oh, that’s brilliant. I look forward to submitting that as evidence the next time some grey little drone solemnly informs me that only the State can do X, Y or Z.

On Monday, Mrs May accused universities of complacency in tackling Islamist extremism – a charge denied by the vice chancellors’ body, Universities UK.

She told the Daily Telegraph: “I don’t think they have been sufficiently willing to recognise what can be happening on their campuses and the radicalisation that can take place. I think there is more that universities can do.”

Absolutely the universities should be held to account, it is all their fault. Do you remember when the paramilitary arm of the University of Central Lancashire went into Algeria, blowing things up left, right and centre?

I’m not one to bang the anti-cuts drum, but you scale back university funding and make the students pay thousands of pounds to attend. Fair enough, but that changes the landscape, that puts the universities into direct market place competition. Are you going to spend the better part of £10k to a university only for the university to start monitoring who you are talking to, where and what about? That’s business suicide.

But the new document is expected to say the government will ensure that no more cash will be given “to organisations that hold extremist views or support terrorist-related activity of any kind”.

But this is revolutionary! One of the best ways to hamstring extremist groups is to starve them of funds, I’m so glad that it is as easy as stopping giving them the money from my taxes.

Previously, Mrs May has said that, as a result of the strategy’s review of government support, about 20 of the organisations that received funding over the past three years would have their cash withdrawn.

According to the Times, one reason for the failings of the current policy was a lack of scrutiny of the programme to test whether money was going to legitimate groups and bringing benefits.

Because this is what happens when you hand out cash to ridiculous special interest groups, be they the Muslim Council of Britain (I’ve never seen an election for them, they’re not self appointed, by any chance, are they?), the NSPCC or the Dunfermline Dramatic Society for Amputee Transgender Somalis. Realistically, the benefits for society are far outweighed by the cold, hard cash poured into them, and the voice of the rest of society is drowned out by the high pitched whine given by the addicts when the flow of the fiscal narcotic is stemmed.

Speaking of special interest groups:

But Azad Ali, chairman of the Muslim Safety Forum. . .

Who? The Muslim Safety Forum? What? Is this to do with making sure that hard hats are halal?

. . . and an advisor to the previous government on extremism, said the government should not attack ideologies.

You’re kidding yourself mate, that’s all governments do. Attacking ideologies is what governments do best, and I’m wondering how long it is until anyone who holds an opinion on any subject that is contrary to that of government is labelled as an extremist.

You’ve been used, buddy. Stings, doesn’t it?

You can spend as much money as you like combating terrorism and extremists, but until such time as we really want to tackle the cause nothing will change. The cause is not swivel eyed preachers and websites with shouty music and footage of half arsed training camps. The cause is what makes these people susceptible to the rantings of these nutters in the first place, I’m afraid we have to look at our actions abroad, both militarily – did we really need to go into Iraq? Was there no history before 9/11? Who funded the nutters that took over Afghanistan? We did, because of our fears over the USSR. Who occupied Iran and propped up the hated and authoritarian Mohammad Reza Pahlavi? – and diplomatically – look at our support or silence over a number of regimes across the world, keeping people under the thumb, voiceless and destitute.

Is it any wonder there’s a parade of angry, desperate and hopeless people? You’ll always get religious nutters, the West has their fair share, but it might be an idea to stop pushing people towards them. 

Why would they do that?

Tens of thousands of Belgians have staged a march to call for national unity and demand a government after seven months of political impasse.

About 50,00 people joined the “Shame: no government, great country” march in Brussels, organisers said. Police put the number at 34,000.

I went to Belgium for the day just before Christmas. It was bloody unbelievable, they’d had months of no government, and the roads were open, trains were running, cafes and shops were open for business, the busses worked, police were patrolling, streets were clean. It was a nightmare, the whole fabric of society had come crashing down because there wasn’t a bunch of grey suited men and women sitting around telling everyone what they should do.

Oh, what am I thinking? That isn’t the sign of a society in meltdown because there wasn’t a government, that is the sign of the fact that not having a government made absolutely no difference to the lives of the ten million or so who live in the country, a country that, some people would have you believe, is so ridden with mistrust between the Flemish and French speakers that a repeat of Yugoslavia in the 90′s, but with fewer hills and more chips, is just an offensive joke away.

I am amazed that the EU didn’t come in and declare Belgium to be something along the lines of the District of Columbia, or the Australian Capital Territory and place it under direct EU control. They’ve missed a trick there.

Here’s a newsflash kids, a lack of government doesn’t mean living in Somalia. Here’s a few stories I’ve lifted at random from Google with a three word search ‘[name of country]‘, ‘government’ and ‘criticised’. Let’s see what’s been going on, shall we?

Canada’s government has been criticised for spending huge sums to host G8 and G20 summits at the end of June, including two million dollars on a fake lake inside the media centre. (08/06/2010)

An Australian government proposal for a mandatory web filter has been criticised by key internet players Google and Yahoo as a heavy-handed measure that could restrict access to legal information. (24/03/2010)

South Korea has been heavily criticised for burying up to one million pigs alive as it grapples with a foot and mouth disease outbreak. (07/01/2011)

A well-known Nazi hunter criticized a Latvian court Tuesday for allowing a procession to commemorate the day in 1941 when Nazi troops entered the country’s capital after ejecting the Soviet Union’s Red Army. (29/06/2010)

The above stories make you wonder how we cope without governments. I really feel for the Belgians, having to live without a proper government. It must be really hard for them. [/sarcasm]

My mind goes back to the election when both the Tories and Labour were warning about the disatisfaction of a coalition government. We needed, by all accounts, a strong government. That would have been best.

Best for whom? Those forming the government, without doubt. For the rest of us? Belgium would suggest it doesn’t make a great deal of difference. Indeed, not having the endless initiatives, policies, back tracking, u-turns, arguments, waste and everything else that goes with a ‘strong’ government, looks like a marked improvement to me.

I reckon we’ve got enough laws to be getting on with thank-you very much. Once you’ve covered the biggies, the rest is farting about on the margins, and politicians are too caught up in the notion of ‘legacy’ for my liking.

No, not having a government didn’t seem to bother the good people of Bruges one bit as far as I could see.

Compare and contrast.

I’m making no points about either event, but how does (emphasis mine):

New rules aimed at banning discrimination by employers, covering areas such as age, disability and pay, have come into force.

The Equality Act covers many workplace areas and draws nine separate pieces of legislation into a single Act.

Sit with:

[...]There are also corresponding increases for younger workers, with 16 and 17-year-olds seeing a rise from £3.57 an hour to £3.64.

So in effect, if an employer were to deny a 17 year old a promotion on the basis that they were too young, they’d be liable to prosecution under the new Equality Act. However, the government is totally at liberty to limit minimum wage payments for those under 21.

Some are obviously more equal than others. . .

Stating the bleeding obvious about stating the bleeding obvious.

Another swipe of the axe today.

The government is to get rid of 287 advertising and marketing jobs as part of its spending cuts programme.

Staff numbers at the Central Office of Information (COI) will fall by two-fifths from 737 to 450.

The move follows a government freeze on “non-essential advertising”, with the COI’s budget estimated to have fallen by more than half.

Chief executive Mark Lund said the operation would become “leaner”, but unions said they were “disappointed”.

Staff are being offered the chance to apply for voluntary redundancy, although there are expected to be compulsory lay-offs.

The usual caveat here. I am a public servant and may well hear the swoosh of the axe myself before long, but the simple facts are that we are broke, the government is too bloated and too fond of interfering. I really do sympathise with the people who are now staring down the barrel.

It is hard to think of an area where this is more true than with government advertising.

The concept is an odd one, they take our money for a service, then spend more of our money telling us about the service they’ve taken our money to pay for. I would suggest that if they need to tell us about it, we don’t need that service too much, otherwise we’d all be demanding to know where this service is.

Look at this one:

What’s the message here? Don’t eat crap, don’t sit on your rapidly expanding arse all day long and you won’t keel over at 40 after the Japanese harpoon you whilst you’re walking down the street? Really? Is this vital information?

No, of course not. It is evidence of a government that just cannot help sticking its bloody nose in and trying to micro manage every aspect of our lives. We know this, and those that haven’t made a connection between the tenth slice of chocolate cake and the small objects in perpetual orbit around their wobbling bulk are so stupid that the gene pool will not miss them all that much.

Let’s have another, shall we?


Whoa! Hang on just a minute, do you mean to tell me that taking money I’m not entitled to is a crime, and if I commit a crime then I may end up in the land of the stripey sunshine? Has anyone told the MPs? There’s also another favourite of the government in here as well, ‘we’re watching you’. A message you may remember from other government adverts like the one where your car is going to be crushed, because you’ve not given them money to piss away on advertising campaigns or when the TV licencing man calls round, because you’ve not given the BBC money to piss away on political and environmental indoctrination.

One last one:

Once again, stating the bleeding obvious. You can tell us all you like, the fact is that some twats (normally only a few years past the golden haired child who will be chasing the brightly coloured ball into the road) will always drive at 40mph at maximum revs down a street like the one pictured above because they are indeed twats, and couldn’t care less. Browbeating the rest of us won’t change this. A responsible driver doesn’t need a speed limit (although I understand why they exist) on a road like this, because they will see the conditions and think to themselves, ‘hmmmm, someone might step out here, best reduce my speed to minimise the risk of a collision if they do’.

Those that don’t should have their licences taken away for driving like a clot.

And once again, another favourite of the government at the bottom. Telling us to be scared. No such thing as a safe road, best keep the kiddies inside.

Of course the problem with keeping the kiddies inside is that they can’t move about like nanny says in the first advert.

Goverment advertising: Disjointed, stating the bleeding obvious, nannying, scaremongering, expensive and won’t be missed at all.

The One That Is Stealing. . .

That break didn’t last long, did it?

This from Old Holborn, I’ll be having a copy printed off and ready, just in case, when the campaigning really starts:

Just to remind us what 13 years of power can do (cut out and keep edition):

Ballot Boxes are interfered with

Voting registers go missing

The Police can kill innocent people and get away with it

The state can kill people and get away with it

You can be put in prison for 42 days on pure suspicion

You can be put in prison indefinitely on the word of a politician

The State can torture people

Your children are monitored at School by Political Officers

Their behaviour is logged on a State database for their entire lives

Your innocent fingerprints, iris scans and biometrics are held by the State

You do not have the right to remain silent

You are watched on 4 million CCTV cameras

You may not photograph the Police

The media is controlled by the State

You do not have the right to protest peacefully

Curfews exist for entire communities

Your travel movements are logged and monitored

Who you vote for is logged and monitored

Your shopping habits are studied and logged by the State

Your emails and telephone conversations are recorded by the State

Your passport can be withdrawn at the whim of the State

Government agencies can use lie detector tests on you.

- £22,500 of debt for every child born in Britain

- 111 tax rises from a government that promised no tax rises at all

- The longest national tax code in the world

- 100,000 million pounds drained from British pension funds

- Gun crime up 57%

- Violent crime up 70%

- The highest proportion of children living in workless households anywhere in Europe

- The number of pensioners living in poverty up by 100,000

- The lowest level of social mobility in the developed world

- The only G7 country with no growth this year

- One in six young people neither earning nor learning

- 5 million people on out-of-work benefits

- Missing the target of halving child poverty…

- Child poverty rising in each of the last three years instead

- Cancer survival rates among the worst in Europe

- Hospital-acquired infections killing nearly three times as many people as are killed on the roads

- Falling from 4th to 13th in the world competitiveness league

- Falling from 8th to 24th in the world education rankings in maths

- Falling from 7th to 17th in the rankings in literacy

- The police spending more time on paperwork than on the beat

- Fatal stabbings at an all-time high

- Prisoners released without serving their sentences

- Foreign prisoners released and never deported

- 7 million people without an NHS dentist

- Small business taxes going up

- Business taxes raised from among the lowest to among the highest in Europe

- Tax rises for working people set for after the election

- The 10p tax rate abolished

- The ludicrous promise to have ended boom and bust

- Our gold reserves sold for a quarter of their worth

- Our armed forces overstretched and under-supplied

- Profitable post offices closed against their will

- One of the highest rates of family breakdown in Europe

- The ‘Golden Rule’ on borrowing abandoned because it didn’t fit

- Police inspectors in 10 Downing Street

- Dossiers that were dodgy

- Mandelson resigning the first time

- Mandelson resigning the second time

- Mandelson coming back for a third time

- Bad news buried

- Personal details lost

- An election bottled

- A referendum denied

- The removal of the right to trial by jury

Apparently the Labour slogan for the coming election will be ‘a future fair for all’. Well, you’ve had thirteen fucking years, you arsewipes. Now, despite the litany above, you want more time?

Here’s Snowolf’s election slogans:

BECAUSE YOU’RE STUPID AND NEED TELLING WHAT TO DO.

BECAUSE WE’RE NOT LABOUR AND IT’S OUR BLOODY TURN.

BECAUSE THE LOOK OF SHEER PANIC IN OUR EYES IF WE GOT THE GIG WOULD BE OFFSET BY OUR COMPLETE CAPITULATION TO BRUSSELS.


BECAUSE WE BELEIVE IN PERSONAL FREEDOM AND SMALL GOVERNMENT, UNLESS IT’S OUR GOVERNMENT.

BECAUSE YOU’VE NOWHERE ELSE TO TURN.

BECAUSE YOU NEED TO BE GUILT RIDDEN, LIVING IN A TREE. BUT WE WON’T BE, WE’VE IMPORTANT WORK TO DO.